Meatless vs. More Meat Mondays

Now that we are back in action here at Currant Table, it feels good to have a forum in which we can highlight the positive changes (Prop 37 on this fall’s ballot) and call into questions those that set us back. In the case of the recent scuffle between the USDA and the NBCA (National Cattleman’s Beef Association) . . . . set us WAY BACK.

In quick summary, at the end of July, the USDA announced that they were in support of ‘Meatless Monday’s’, a movement that strives to improve the health of Americans and the environment by cutting meat out of our diets for one day a week. May I note here that there are still 6 MORE days in the week where a participant could subsist entirely on meat if they so choose? In response, the president of the NBCA, J.D. Alexander, released a statement accusing the USDA of not supporting the beef industry, and calling Meatless Mondays ‘an animal rights extremist campaign to ultimately end meat consumption.’ He also claimed “This is truly an awakening statement by USDA, which strongly indicates that USDA does not understand the efforts being made in rural America to produce food and fiber for a growing global population in a very sustainable way,”

If you just laughed out loud . . . don’t worry, so did I. There is NOTHING sustainable about the way we farm beef industrially in the United Sates. And, call me crazy, but announcing that you ‘support’ Meatless Monday, does not in fact mean that you hate meat, or believe that people should stop consuming it. I understand the perceived conflict of interest on the part of the NBCA, however, could it not also be seen as the USDA supporting the one other facets of industrial agriculture for one day? ‘Support Tomato Farmer Mondays!’

I could go back and forth, and come up with my own snarky unfounded assertions to match those of Alexander, but I won’t. As annoyed as I was by the official NBCA statement, they do have a right to a government who protects their interests as much as the next person.

However, we kick this confrontation up a notch when those in DC get involved, and call for the over consumption of meat on the following Monday. The two following tweets are from Senator Chuck Grassley (Iowa) and Congressman Steve King (Iowa).

Grassley’s office, with a handful of other co-conspirators then went so far as to call for a celebration of Meat Mondays.

This photo was posted to the facebook page of junior senator John Cornyn, and depicts the lunch purchased from a local BBQ restaurant in DC. A staffer said that the lunch included  a total of 52 orders of barbecue beef sandwiches, brisket, sausage and ribs, as well as sides of cornbread and macaroni and cheese. Do you all remember those annoying boys in middle school who, when faced with someone else’s effort to, say ‘Save the Whales’ would wear an ‘I hate Whales’ t-shirt? I do, and it is even more obnoxious when adult men engage in the same behavior, and order more meat than an entire office could consume (WASTEFUL) just to make a rather asinine point.

From a food standpoint, since that is what we, here at Currant Table are all about, Meatless Mondays provide a day for American’s to think outside the box of ‘meat/vegetable/carb’ dinners, and get creative while improving their health and the health of the environment. It SHOULD be supported by government offices, because the government is supposed to have our best interests at heart (right?).  I personally know sustainable meat farmers (poultry, beef, pork etc . . .) who engage in Meatless Mondays themselves, without having their entire business crash down around their ears. So it begs the question, what is the NBCA so concerned about? It can’t possibly be that one day a week a fraction of Americans choose not to eat any type of meat (again, 6 more days in the week) so it must be something else.

Could it be that they are starting to feel the squeeze, albeit just a pinch at this point, caused by those of us fighting the fight in the name of accurate information?  We stated in an earlier post, that there is a LOT of it flying around, and that sometimes it is tough to make heads or tails of what you are reading. But in this case it is fairly straightforward:

-Meatless Monday’s are intended to improve the heart health of Americans and help stave off the obesity epidemic.

-Meatless Monday’s are intended to reduce the carbon footprint of an individual, reduce water usage and reduce fossil fuel usage.

-Meatless Monday’s are not intended to turn everyone into vegetarians.

-The NBCA is afraid of Meatless Mondays

In response to the negative outpouring of statements, and actions, only a fraction of which I have mentioned, the USDA recanted their endorsement of Meatless Mondays. This is yet another example of the uphill battle that those of us who believe that we deserve better food are facing.  I know how we at Current Table feel about this, but how do you all feel?

We endorse Meatless Mondays, and encourage all of you reading to visit their site for delicious menu ideas, and information about how you can promote it in your community!

You heard me . . . . Currant Table supports Meatless Mondays! Come and get us NBCA 🙂

Meatless Monday: http://www.meatlessmonday.com

http://www.beefusa.org/newsreleases1.aspx?newsid=2560

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/30/meatless-monday-chuck-grassley_n_1720505.html#slide=more241780

To eat . . . or not to eat? A shockingly complicated question!

This blog, in large part, has been a fairly tongue-and-cheek chronicle of our gardening adventures. Following this trial-and-error venture with a sense of humor is fun, though touching on why we are doing this in the first place is something that we haven’t gone into great detail about. Leah and I, though we are partners in Currant Table, may not necessarily have arrived at the conviction that we need to change the way we appreciate food in the same way. We do, however, agree on the underlying need for change.

Right now, in the United States (though frighteningly enough it is spreading to other countries as well) we have a sense of entitlement towards foods. We are entitled to have whatever we want, whenever we want it. Pineapples in Maine in February? Of course that is a reasonable expectation . . . . leaving aside the fact that Hawaii is about 5,000 miles away from Maine. ‘Plump’ juicy chicken breasts for 99c a pound? Totally expected, ignoring the fact that the reason they are plump is from water absorption. Sleek flamingo-pink salmon fillets? They should be cheap and available in unfailing abundance, and, through the ‘magic’ of aquaculture, they are.

I know that I am dancing on the line of sounding preachy, and I do firmly believe that deciding what to eat is personal, and should be respected. I don’t believe, however, that everyone has all the information. We had a professor at UCLA who made the most amazing analogy about how Americans treat their food supply. He said to think of it like a credit card. The immediate consumption of the foods I mentioned above is the swipe of the plastic. Should you really buy that skirt? No, but you can deal with the fact that you can’t really afford it later. The problem with putting off the reality of payment is that you lose touch with the value of things. We don’t have to pay the full price for readily available chicken, salmon, or pineapples right now, but eventually that debt will have to be settled. In the case of food the debt to be paid is in destruction of the planet, natural resources, community support, and even morality.

Sustainable food is, quite simply, a nearly debt free food. To keep this from getting long-winded, lets just talk about salmon. Sustainable seafood is incredibly complex (I happen to be obsessed with it), but the bottom line is that the seafood you purchase is deemed sustainable if it is harvested from a population without putting it in jeopardy, and using a responsible harvest method (think dolphin safe tuna). It is also sustainable if it is farmed in an ecologically responsible way. Flamingo-pink salmon is none of these things, and while it tastes great (yes, I admit it) there are better choices to be made.

One of our primary goals at Currant Table to is to help educate people so that whatever decision they make is coming from an informed place. A good rule of thumb going forward is to ask! Ask the fish guy where the salmon comes from, and if he can’t tell you, be concerned. Ask the meat guy if you don’t like what types of meat they have available. Ask the produce guy how old that anemic February pineapple is! Michael Polan urges people to vote with their forks, and we agree. Make sure the things you want to eat are available by asking for them, otherwise how would anyone ever know they were needed?

I have included links to books that changed our way of thinking . . . and cannot recommend them highly enough! Please ask us questions, leave comments, or suggest sources of your own. Going forward, we will touch upon all of the facets of sustainability but for now, lets just say that we are passionate about making a difference, and that no change (however small) is insignificant!

Books:

In Defense of Food, Michael Polan

Eating Animals, Johnathan Safran Foer

Animal, Vegetable, Miracle, Barbara Kingsolver

Four Fish, Paul Greenburg

Links:

Seafood Watch: http://www.montereybayaquarium.org/cr/seafoodwatch.

Seafood for the Future: http://seafoodforthefuture.org/